[ASK AN EXPERT] How to Recognize Soft Credited Donors in Honor Roll Listings

Full Platform Overview Chat With Us
Full Platform Overview Chat With Us
Our Ask An Expert series features real questions answered by Claire Axelrad, J.D., CFRE, our very own Fundraising Coach, also known as Charity Clairity.
Today’s question comes from a fundraiser who isn’t sure whether or not a soft credit should be included in a donor’s level of giving on an annual report.
Dear Charity Clairity,
When recognizing a donor in an annual report, should you include the soft credit in their level of giving? For instance, you have columns for donors who gave less than $100, and another with donors from $101 -$250 – If the donor gave $75 and it was matched, should that donor be in the $100 list or $101-$250 list?
— Softie Solution Sought
Dear Softie,
The short answer is your donor should be in the $101 – $250 list.
You must always think from the donor perspective. That’s the heart of donor-centered fundraising.
In this case, the donor feels personally responsible for generating a total gift of $150 (their $75 plus their employer’s matching $75). Were it not for them recommending the matching gift, you’d never have received it. Right? So they deserve the credit!
There are two considerations when it comes to soft crediting third party gifts (i.e., since the employer isn’t the donor, they are a “third party.” The same would hold true if the donor recommended a gift from a donor advised fund or a family foundation.)
Third party gifts are double entered.
Third party gifts can be publicly recognized and credited to both involved parties. Here the trick is to think about cumulative giving.
I hope this helps to ‘clairify’ things!
— Charity Clairity
Have a question for Charity Clairity?
Have a question for our Fundraising Coach?
Please submit your question here. Remember, there are no stupid questions! If you need an answer, it’s likely someone else does too. So help your colleagues by asking away. Please use a pseudonym, like “Softie” did, if you prefer to be anonymous.
Comments